![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBDQaUEsaTQx_xHQ73k6s-HE3ACF7p5rtNLsTeV7ykiOUCWU0C_9eFgvxPw_GPPsVOm0VFVbY9x3CDiVTofhynam5bW9wIud7qhklxedXvW1By2JArJ4X8j557zoFuuBw-nhVVoyY_4n4/s1600/%25E5%259B%259E%25E6%2595%2599%25E5%259B%25BD.jpg)
308后,有些评论员依然批评“政府又派糖果”,而政党领袖也否认派大选糖果。其实,“派糖果”又什么错,承认就对了嘛!哪个政党不是为了选票,而工作的?哪个政府不是为了继续执政,而执行有利国民的策略的?派糖果就是要得到选票,选票就是政党的命根子,这有什么不对的?这就是政治现实。
今天,国民很悲哀,尤其是华裔,他们痛恨马华在维护华人权益上,无法代表华裔;他们痛恨巫统的霸权傲慢,还有那“不容挑战”的执政态度。然而,在别无选择之下,华裔选择了他们这50年来都不曾爱过的回教党,他们在极度失望下,将手中的一票投给回教党。就算马华再炒冷饭,挑起神权回教国的课题,甚至获得回教党领袖多次地公开承认,一旦民联执政中央,议席多过公正党的话,将会全面修改国家宪法,让回教教义纳入全民的生活中。但是,华裔没有在怕,反而继续地为他们鼓掌。
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyqYKxsQfrfesoADWupIpOkfUgjCmrotNVuACbbJIX1CSGzCBycZHU87bajzf89u3Y5u68ttm0ddtYYmikCinryqxs6tsX-ES2LQsgwOnQrdkMdBlQvaOH7OYlcAoUAM3WF4aidds5WVs/s1600/pas_umno.png)
1969历史重现 回教大团结 华人失政治力量?
1969年大选,国阵元气大伤,马华败得凄惨,选择退出内阁;就在那个时候,巫统招揽回教党加入后来成立的国阵。同样地,来届大选,若国阵无法取得优越的成绩,而回教党在民联肯定无法获得行动党的认同,实施回教刑事法和修改宪法等,与达致其神权回教国目标的情况下,“回教大团结”必定重现,而巫统与回教党的结合,不仅是民联的悲哀,也是国阵的遗憾。民联的瓦解,还有国阵的变质,那才是马来西亚政治真正走入“新里程碑”的时候。马华、民政党和行动党三党只能一起抱头痛哭,而成为历史下的牺牲品。
国阵的贪污,民联的回教教义,国民要如何选择?国阵的贪污,我们还能相信纳吉有能力肃贪吗?民联的回教教义,我们能相信行动党可以制衡回教党吗?贪污与回教交义,哪个会直接影响我们的生活?
1 条评论:
a question that raise to me again by some politician - how can we assure that PAS do not turn Malaysia to Islamic state? i corrected his question to be - How can we assure that any party (including UMNO, PAS, PKR) do not change Malaysia to Islamic state when they need that as a political credit...
my answer is - if the apex court are playing the role well, any constitutional changes or progressive changes towards that should be claimed by court, that it is unconstitutional! The question is, do our court able to distinguish the element, and at the same time, withstand the big pressure suppress by certain group of people, and make a constitutional judgement and protecting the true Malaysia that we have.
It is wrong to rely on any party to protect our secular state status, because that should be protected by constitution, and the court are the vanguard. Question is again, why we lost confidence on our court?
发表评论